Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition) ›› 2009, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 40-52.
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Abstract: A retrospection of the 30year process of the Chinese reform and openingup, even the 60year history in China, can find out the fact that the Chinese government reform has been following such a route that the systematical regulation is always emphasized to seek for the new mode of economic development, since the central government always faces the financial pressure that produces its driving force in reformation. During the early years of the new China, in order to prove the superiority of the new regime, the government chose the administrative system of highcentralized power, and, at the same time, used planned economy to develop heavy industry and chemical industry, thus establishing rapidly the comparatively completed industrial system. Up to the end of the Cultural Revolution, faced with the nearly collapsed national economy, the government chose the administrative system of decentralization. While the target of limited government was determined, the socialist market economy was developed by way of the economic system reformation. And the government was separated from market so successfully that market outburst unpredictable vitality and economy developed rapidly. Although, by virtue of the 20year reform and openingup, the financial pressure of the central government was relieved, the rapid economic development didn' t make everything all right. Since economy, especially social development, demands on a new, higher level for the government, the establishment of a limited but efficient government becomes the new target of the government reform. Accordingly, the mode of economy growth changes from lowquality to both overall consideration and scientific development, that is, from "both fast and good" to "both good and fast". The fundamental goal of this new round of reform is to construct a harmonious society. In order to achieve that goal, not only do the function and institution of the central government require regulating but also the assessment system for political achievement is necessary to be perfected, thus ensuring that limited resources can be applied to the public requirement of the people, and to the health progress of national economy.
Key words: Key words:Limited Government;Efficient Government;Reform and Openingup
CLC Number:
中图分类号: C9302文献标志码: A文章编号: 10076522(2009)04004013
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/
https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/Y2009/V16/I4/40
参考文献: [1] 张维迎. 中国改革30年——10位经济学家的思考[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社,2008:195,246. [2] 任剑涛. 政府何为——中国政府改革的定位、状态与类型[J]. 公共行政评论,2008,(1):6870. [3] Richard A Musgrave, Peggy B Musgrave. Public Finance in Theory and Practice[M]. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1987:6065. [4] 刘鹏. 论有限政府与有效政府的关系及其建构过程[J]. 云南行政学院学报,2003,(4):2729. [5] 袁方成. 我国政府改革的阶段性特征:分析与前瞻[J]. 社会主义研究,2008,(3):6061. [6] 孙涛. 比较视野下的中国政府官员规模研究[J]. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,(1):6676. [7] 朱丽峰. 论我国服务型政府的绩效考核[D]. 吉林大学硕士学位论文,2007:2035. [8] 张丽. 和谐社会背景下的政府绩效评估评析[D]. 吉林大学硕士学位论文,2007:19. [9] 孙立平,毕向阳. 基本公共服务均等化:公共治理与多元参与[C]//中国(海南)改革发展研究院.基本公共服务与中国人类发展. 北京:中国经济出版社,2008:388394. [10]郑方辉,雷比璐. 基于公众满意度导向的地方政府绩效评价[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究,2007:4950.