Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition)
• Articles • Previous Articles
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
As a classic humanistic thinking, Marxism has an obvious difference from Christianity. While the former, a revolutionary theory about human emancipation, and a worldview of atheism, embodies the ideology of proletariate, the latter, being considered as the historical achievement of human religious faith and the creation theory of theism, covers up the valueconcept of bourgeoisie. But as far as the humanistic care is concerned, both have an intercommunity. In detail, both are common and interlinked in such aspects as the ideal society, the human welfare, the philanthropic spirit, the fair order and the free right. Based on this, and being established in the historical process of China' s construction of the harmonious society of the peopleoriented, this essay gives an emphasis on their mutualaid relationship in the aspects of humanistic thinking and humanistic care, which possesses a beyondneglect significance in practice. On the one hand, Marxist revolutionary pursue for the happy ideal of the present society can fill a void in Christian seeking for the distant paradise of human afterlife and renovate the feeble salvation by solid activity; and on the other hand, the human limited ability and humanistic faultiness, which are established by Christian original sin, can wake the Marxist in prudently holding human rationality for seeking ideal, preventing him from rash advance, and, by way of modest piety, makes a constant approach to the perfect ideal society, thus ensuring the realistic benefit of the people oriented, and guiding the pursue for the peopleoriented spirit. The principle of seeking common ground, cooperation and mutual aid can be thought as the concrete mode in humanistic thoughts by which Marxism and Christianity go ahead together, and also as the new measure of strengthening the construction of the harmonious society.
Key words: Marxism; Christianity; difference; intercommunity; mutualaid
LI Zhi-Xiong. The Sword and Cross: A Comparative Study on Marxism and Christianity Within the Humanistic Field of Vision[J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition).
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/
https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/Y2011/V18/I4/128
参考文献: [1] 斯拉沃热·齐泽克. 易碎的绝对——基督教遗产为何值得奋斗?[M]. 南京: 江苏人民出版社,2004. [2] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集:第1卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1995. [3] 刘建军. 基督宗教十字架的象征[C]//梁工. 圣经文学研究:第二辑. 北京: 人民出版社,2008. [4] 新旧约全书[M]. 南京:中国基督教协会,1994. [5] 张庆熊. 基督教神学范畴——历史的和文化比较的考察[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社,2003. [6] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集:第3卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1995. [7] Nashville. The Holy Bible[M]. Tennesse: Holman Bible Publishers, 2000:1. [8] Owen Waterson. Longman Modern English Dictionary[Z]. Harlow and London: Longman Group Limited, 1976:453. [9] Frederick C Mish. The MerriamWebester Dictionary[Z]. Springfield, Massachusetts: MerriamWebster, Incorporated, 2004:310. [10] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集:第21卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1965:545. [11] 田薇. 马克思与基督教关联的双重面相——从洛维特审理近代启蒙历史观的神学前提谈起[J]. 学术月刊,2009,(6):3944. [12] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集:第42卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1979:169. [13] David Chidester. Christianity: A Global History[M]. New York:HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.2000:156. [14] 弗·梅林. 马克思传:上[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1965. [15] 欧内斯特·勒南. 耶稣的一生[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1999:286. [16] 赵敦华. 基督教哲学1500年[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1994:176. [17] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集:第1卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1956:436. [18] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集:第4卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1995: 415. [19] 杨卫华. 来华新教传教士话语中的共产主义——对《教务杂志》有关观点的剖析[C]//基督教思想评论:总第八辑. 上海:世纪出版集团,上海人民出版社,2008. [20] 刘小枫. 圣灵降临的叙事[M]. 北京:生活·读书·新知 三联书店,2003:5367. [21] 麦格拉思. 基督教概论[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2003:350351. [22] 卓新平. “全球化”的宗教与当代中国[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008:334. [23] 吕大吉. 宗教学通论新编:上[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998:7980. [24] 方立天. 论中国化马克思主义宗教观[J]. 中国社会科学,2005,(4):4153. [25] 阿尔文·施密特. 基督教对文明的影响[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2004:246. [26] 杨慧林.The Sword and Cross: A Comparative Study on Marxism and Christianity Within the Humanistic Field of Vision 圣言·人言——神学诠释学[M]. 上海:上海译文出版社,2002:230.